Join
AES
Join
AES
Contact
Us
Contact
Us
Hiring a consultant for a specific task is fundamentally different from engaging one to drive organisational transformation.
Boards often recognise the need for change when membership stagnates, governance weakens, strategy stalls, or momentum declines. Engaging a consultant at this point is a sound decision.
The outcome of a consulting engagement should be defined before work begins. For example, a recent client engaged Association Executive Services to review their risk policies and procedures, seeking validation and an external assessment of their risk management practices.
One of the first questions our AES consultants ask Boards is straightforward:
What outcome are you actually trying to achieve?
Without clear objectives, consultant engagements often lack direction and effectiveness.
Association Boards operate in a very different environment from corporate boards.
Most are committed, capable members who bring passion, industry insight, and a real desire to contribute. Many have completed director training.
Their role is broader and often more complex than many anticipate.
They are not just custodians. They are responsible for:
This is especially challenging in a voluntary environment.
This is why bringing in the right external support at the right moment is essential.
With over 30 years of experience in associations, I can state confidently:
Many Boards seek proposals before they are clear on what they actually need.
We frequently receive well-intentioned requests that lack clarity, often due to poorly defined problems.
Preparing a proposal requires time, thought, and clarity about what success means.
For these reasons, we are selective about the Boards we engage with.
Before preparing a proposal, we typically begin with a discussion.
The purpose is to understand your needs, not to sell services.
This conversation is essential, as it often clarifies the organisation’s objectives before formal engagement.
When a Board defines clear outcomes, proposals become more focused, scopes are practical, and the likelihood of success increases.
One of the more telling questions we ask is:
The focus is not on price, but on organisational readiness and maturity.
In many cases, the response is:
At this point, Boards should pause and reflect.
Not-for-profit status does not justify underinvestment. Boards must prioritise sustainability, member value, and future readiness. When setting a consulting budget, clarify expected outcomes and available resources. Allocate a budget that matches your ambition and the scale of the challenge. Consulting budgets may range from modest investments for specific projects to larger allocations for strategic transformation. Benchmark against similar associations, discuss budget expectations with consultants early, and set a realistic range that covers preparation, implementation, and follow-up. This approach positions both the consultant and your Board for success.
If there’s truly no investment capacity for core issues—membership, governance, strategy, or structure—the question is larger than consultant engagement.
It raises a more confronting issue:
If investment in performance, adaptation, or foundational strength is not possible, organisational decline is inevitable, even if gradual.
Not every engagement requires a large budget, but Boards must remain realistic about necessary investment.
Boards that focus solely on cost often postpone addressing critical issues.
Strong Boards see it differently.
Investing in the right advice ensures long-term viability and relevance.
If investment is not feasible, the discussion should shift from engaging a consultant to evaluating the organisation’s long-term viability.
While many consultants are available, not all are effective within the association context.
Here’s what matters.
Sector experience is critical. Associations are complex, with unique governance, membership dynamics, and stakeholder relationships. Seek consultants with direct association experience, not just advisory backgrounds.
Be alert to warning signs when selecting a consultant. Red flags include limited experience in association work, generic proposals, unclear methodology, or reluctance to share specific examples of past impact. Consultants who offer only broad promises without demonstrating an understanding of the challenges of association should be approached with caution.
Methodology matters as much as expertise. Effective consultants provide more than ideas; they deliver a structured and disciplined approach to achieving outcomes.
Evidence over opinion. The strongest consultants use benchmarking, data, and real-world comparisons—not just perspective.
Breadth of capability: Strategy, governance, membership, and operations are interconnected. Consultants who understand the entire system deliver greater value.
Proof of impact: Seek evidence—case studies, outcomes, and real organisational improvements.
We also ask directly: Why us?
The answer reveals much about the success of engagement.
Strong answers sound like:
Weaker answers tend to be:
Engagements driven primarily by procurement considerations often result in suboptimal outcomes.
Engaging a consultant to drive change is not simply outsourcing the problem.
It involves leveraging external experience, perspective, and structure to address challenges effectively.
The most successful engagements function as partnerships:
With these elements, results can be transformative.
When they’re not, even the best consultant will struggle to create lasting impact.
If your Board is considering engaging a consultant, take a step back before you go to market.
Be clear on your goal. Be realistic about what’s required. Be deliberate in whom you choose.
You are not just buying a service.
You’re shaping the organisation’s future direction, performance, and sustainability.
Key takeaways for success: clarify outcomes, invest realistically, ensure internal alignment, value genuine consultant partnership, and view consulting as a future-focused investment.
As a next step, let's schedule a Board meeting to align on your desired outcomes and investment parameters. Initiate an open discussion among Board members and executive leadership about the specific goals driving your interest in consulting support, and identify any gaps in internal readiness. Taking this first action will help move your Board from reflection to an actionable plan.
We’re seeing a growing trend. More and more groups are reaching out to start new associations.
In most cases, the reason is the same: "Our current association isn’t delivering."
That may well be true. Starting a new association is a serious commitment, not just a reaction. Let me be clear:
One of the most common — and often unexpected — challenges faced by association boards and leaders arises when a member develops a grievance against the organisation. In the association sector, this is not unusual. Most grievances begin with a concern or disagreement, but if not handled appropriately, they can escalate into a prolonged and disruptive issue.
Insights from the AES Technology Survey and Special Interest Group Discussion
Artificial Intelligence is now part of daily work for many association professionals.
Association Executive Services (AES) are soon to release its
annual report on technology in Australian Associations and recently facilitated a special interest group discussion on the use of AI in
participants' organisations.
How we help membership based, not-for-profit associations now and into the future.